On 08/16/2018 01:48 AM, Phil Endecott wrote:
> Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> On 08/15/2018 01:25 PM, Phil Endecott wrote:
>>> Dear Experts,
>>>
>> The above is not clear to me. My best guess:
>>
> It's not part of the error for the archive command; it's just the
> next thing in the log file. Y is (1) trying write WAL segment
> E8 to the Y-to-Z archive and failing because it is already there and
> (2) trying to read WAL segment E9 from the X-to-Y archive and failing
> because it doesn't exist (and never will). (1) is the problem, (2) is
> expected.
Hmm, still not sure why they are both showing up in the same LOG: entry
as the entry was for the failure of the archive_command.
What is archive_mode set to on Y?
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com