Re: [PERFORM] Restricting Postgres
От | Kevin Barnard |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PERFORM] Restricting Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b068057c041104080051ccc451@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-general |
I am generally interested in a good solution for this. So far our solution has been to increase the hardware to the point of allowing 800 connections to the DB. I don't have the mod loaded for Apache, but we haven't had too many problems there. The site is split pretty good between dynamic and non-dynamic, it's largely Flash with several plugins to the DB. However we still can and have been slammed and up to point of the 800 connections. What I don't get is why not use pgpool? This should eliminate the rapid fire forking of postgres instanaces in the DB server. I'm assuming you app can safely handle a failure to connect to the DB (i.e. exceed number of DB connections). If not it should be fairly simple to send a 503 header when it's unable to get the connection. On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 08:17:22 -0500, Martin Foster <martin@ethereal-realms.org> wrote: > Apache has a global setting for load average limits, the above was just > a module which extended the capability. It might also make sense to > have limitations set on schema's which can be used in a similar way to > Apache directories. > > While for most people the database protecting itself against a sudden > surge of high traffic would be undesirable. It can help those who run > dynamically driven sites and get slammed by Slashdot for example. > > > > Martin Foster > Creator/Designer Ethereal Realms > martin@ethereal-realms.org > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: