Re: Applictaion data Logging
От | Harald Krake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Applictaion data Logging |
Дата | |
Msg-id | at4hvc$2cp9$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Applictaion data Logging (Jesus Sandoval <meli@mzt.megared.net.mx>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Hi! when it comes to portability the right place to implement such auditing is in the OR-mapper. Most commercial mappers already provide such a feature. However, if you don't like "black-boxed" third party software, writing your own mapper isn't a big deal. It's worth the effort! Some hints: - writing a mapper usually ends up with methods like MySpecialDbObject.save() or insert() or update() or alike. - your mapper should provide a method to turn on/off logging on a per class basis. - one solution to the auditing problem is an extra "logging table" per "data table". The logging table holds _all_ the columns of the data table _plus_ a serial number (incremented each time the corresponding data tuple is modified) and things like userid/name, timestamp and so on. - you should store the serial-number in the data-table too. At least, this is how we did it and it works fine. If you don't mind portability postgres probably provides some auditing support, but I don't know. Anyway, you should either use a dbms-inherent feature _or_ do it in your application. Mixing both levels is not a good idea, imho. Hope it helps, Harald.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: