Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | asviy3bnlzpu6kd5ugy6yfs6zs34lcmmu7o63tzxxqpfda44ny@kopzs7pxsswn обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade (Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2025-09-15 11:50:07 +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > On Thu, 11 Sept 2025 at 17:55, Jacob Champion > <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 7:18 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: > > > I don't think we need this level of complication. We already have the > > > situation that for example "linux" covers several tasks > > > > Recently, I've wished that it were otherwise; if I'm debugging a > > Meson-only test failure in Linux, I don't want to burn credits running > > Autoconf. > > I agree with Jacob. I think it would be better if each task had its > own tag. I left it as "vs2019" for now. I don't really agree that this is something that needs to be changed as part of this. Or that the CI_OS_ONLY is really the way to tackle this. Perhaps we should just have CI_TASK_ONLY and CI_OS_ONLY? Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: