Re: xpath_string and group by
От | Arturo Perez |
---|---|
Тема | Re: xpath_string and group by |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aperez-8D5C3B.07054029082006@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | xpath_string and group by (Perez <arturo@ethicist.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: xpath_string and group by
|
Список | pgsql-general |
In article <20060829105458.GB22806@svana.org>, kleptog@svana.org (Martijn van Oosterhout) wrote: > On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 03:51:06PM -0400, Perez wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Using 8.1.4 and contrib/xml2. When I do a > > > > select xpath_string(note, '//Thing') as note, > > count(aDate) from theTable > > group by lower(xpath_string(note, '//Thing')) > > order by 2 desc; > > > > I get an error: > > GROUP BY must contain note. > > But I can do that for a plain text/varchar field. Adding the non-xpath > > note field messes up the grouping. > > I wonder if it's getting confused about which "note" you're referring > to in the GROUP BY clause. > > > select note, count(aDate) from > > (select lower(xpath_string(note, '//Thing')) as note, aDate from > > theTable) as foo > > group by note > > This is about the same thing, so why not use that? > > Have a nice day, You're right, it is almost the same thing. But the second form loses the case of the original - everything is returned lower case. If I must I must but I'ld like to preserve the case is possible. -arturo
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: