VACUUM and locking
От | Denise Bossarte |
---|---|
Тема | VACUUM and locking |
Дата | |
Msg-id | apbkr3$a8f$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: VACUUM and locking
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
I am trying to automate VACUUMing several databases and am confused on how client connections to the database might affect the VACUUM. I have looked at the documentation on locking and VACUUM and have found conflicting reports. The 7.2.1 Documentation http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?locking-tables.html states that VACUUM (without FULL) acquires a ShareUpdateExclusiveLock and VACUUM with FULL acquires an AcessExclusiveLock. However, the 7.2.1 Appendix A. Release Notes state "Vacuuming no longer locks tables, thus allowing normal user access during the vacuum. A new VACUUM FULL command does old-style vacuum by locking the table and shrinking the on-disk copy of the table." Additionally, the "Transaction Processing in Postgres" pdf http://developer.postgresql.org/pdf/transactions.pdf only shows AcessExclusiveLock acquird by VACUUM (full? - not stated) (p. 18). So which, if any, locks does VACUUM acquire? How do client connections to the database affect the VACUUM? What is the best way to automate VACUUM? Thanks for your help, Denise
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: