Re: Broken postgres links need to find callers
От | Rich Shepard |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Broken postgres links need to find callers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.LNX.2.20.1810311142570.26169@salmo.appl-ecosys.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Broken postgres links need to find callers (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Broken postgres links need to find callers
Re: Broken postgres links need to find callers |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Andrew Gierth wrote: > Is there a pg_config binary in /usr/lib/postgresql/10.3/bin/ and if so, > what is the output of /usr/lib/postgresql/10.3/bin/pg_config --sharedir Andrew, Yes, pg_config is present but pointing to the wrong directory: # /usr/lib/postgresql/10.3/bin/pg_config --sharedir /usr/share/postgresql-10.2 However, the file dates are that of the upgrade from 10.2 to 10.3: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 7096448 Mar 1 2018 postgres* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Mar 1 2018 postmaster -> postgres* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 514732 Mar 1 2018 psql* and the postgres version is 10.3: > Also what is the output of /usr/lib/postgresql/10.3/bin/postgres -V # /usr/lib/postgresql/10.3/bin/postgres -V postgres (PostgreSQL) 10.3 > The most plausible explanation I can see for what you're seeing there is > that what you have as /usr/lib/postgresql/10.3/bin/postgres is not > actually the 10.3 binary but rather the 10.2 one. There should be no > symlinks involved there - the path that is reported in the error message > is the one that the postgres binary actually did try to open. Can pg_config be corrected independent of anything else. That seems to be where the blockage is found. Thanks, Rich
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: