RE: proposal: pg_restore --convert-to-text
От | José Arthur Benetasso Villanova |
---|---|
Тема | RE: proposal: pg_restore --convert-to-text |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.LFD.2.21.1903060754390.19411@dreamer.home.benetasso.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: proposal: pg_restore --convert-to-text ("Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai.yoshikazu@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: proposal: pg_restore --convert-to-text
RE: proposal: pg_restore --convert-to-text |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019, Imai, Yoshikazu wrote: > Is there no need to rewrite the Description in the Doc to state we should specify either -d or -f option? > (and also it might be better to write if -l option is given, neither -d nor -f option isn't necessarily needed.) Since the default part of text was removed, looks ok to me. > I also have the simple question in the code. > > I thought the below if-else condition > > + if (filename && strcmp(filename, "-") == 0) > + fn = fileno(stdout); > + else if (filename) > fn = -1; > else if (AH->FH) > > can also be written by the form below. > > if (filename) > { > if(strcmp(filename, "-") == 0) > fn = fileno(stdout); > else > fn = -1; > } > else if (AH->FH) > > I think the former one looks like pretty, but which one is preffered? Aside the above question, I tested the code against a up-to-date repository. It compiled, worked as expected and passed all tests. -- Jose Arthur Benetasso Villanova
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: