Re: pg_buffercache - A lot of "unnamed" relfilenodes?
От | Gerhard Wiesinger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_buffercache - A lot of "unnamed" relfilenodes? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.LFD.2.00.0909262121050.31728@bbs.intern обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_buffercache - A lot of "unnamed" relfilenodes? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_buffercache - A lot of "unnamed" relfilenodes?
Re: pg_buffercache - A lot of "unnamed" relfilenodes? |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Tom Lane wrote: > Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@wiesinger.com> writes: >> Research on the pg_bufferache showed that a lot of pages don't have any >> assigned relfilenodesin pg_class, even when they are dirty (in this case >> inserts are done). > > There should never be any buffered pages for nonexistent tables. The > method you are using will only show relnames for pages belonging to > tables of the current database ... maybe there are a lot of dirty pages > for other databases in the cluster? Or maybe the tables are newly > created (not committed) and so you can't see their pg_class rows yet? > OK, this is a visibility problem of the databases. Is it possible to GRANT visibility for e.g. one user to all databases for pg_class? Thnx. Ciao, Gerhard -- http://www.wiesinger.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: