Re: Table Clustering & Time Range Queries
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Table Clustering & Time Range Queries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.GSO.2.01.0910242007120.27172@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Table Clustering & Time Range Queries (Kevin Buckham <kbuckham@applocation.net>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
I'm surprised clustering as your main optimization has scaled up for you as long as it has, I normally see that approach fall apart once you're past a few hundred GB of data. You're putting a lot of work into a technique that only is useful for smaller data sets than you have now. There are two basic approaches to optimizing queries against large archives of time-series data that do scale up when you can use them: 1) Partition the tables downward until you reach a time scale where the working set fits in RAM. 2) Create materialized views that roll up the data needed for the most common reports people need run in real-time. Optimize when those run to keep overhead reasonable (which sounds possible given your comments about regular maintenance windows). Switch the app over to running against the materialized versions of any data it's possible to do so on. The two standard intros to this topic are at http://tech.jonathangardner.net/wiki/PostgreSQL/Materialized_Views and http://www.pgcon.org/2008/schedule/events/69.en.html From what you've said about your app, I'd expect both of these would be worth considering. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: