Re: Concurrency testing
| От | Greg Smith |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Concurrency testing |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | alpine.GSO.2.01.0910072003060.28103@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Concurrency testing (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Concurrency testing
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I don't find this a compelling argument against concurrent psql. Sure > there are things you can't do with it, but it doesn't mean it's not > useful. Are we going to need further tools to find "the good concurrent > bugs"? No doubt. Don't get me wrong, I wasn't arguing against concurrent psql being useful. Certainly it is. I was just suggesting that the scale of issues it can be useful for is still pretty limited, and that accordingly I found my time better spent working on a higher-level solution that didn't need C-psql anyway. Whether C-psql is sufficient for what David had in mind I can't say. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: