Re: performance for high-volume log insertion
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: performance for high-volume log insertion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.GSO.2.01.0904202302140.19983@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: performance for high-volume log insertion (david@lang.hm) |
Ответы |
Re: performance for high-volume log insertion
Re: performance for high-volume log insertion |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, david@lang.hm wrote: > any idea what sort of difference binary mode would result in? The win from switching from INSERT to COPY can be pretty big, further optimizing to BINARY you'd really need to profile to justify. I haven't found any significant difference in binary mode compared to overhead of the commit itself in most cases. The only thing I consistently run into is that timestamps can bog things down considerably in text mode, but you have to be pretty efficient in your app to do any better generating those those in the PostgreSQL binary format yourself. If you had a lot of difficult to parse data types like that, binary might be a plus, but it doesn't sound like that will be the case for what you're doing. But you don't have to believe me, it's easy to generate a test case here yourself. Copy some typical data into the database, export it both ways: COPY t to 'f'; COPY t to 'f' WITH BINARY; And then compare copying them both in again with "\timing". That should let you definitively answer whether it's really worth the trouble. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: