Re: simultaneously reducing both memory usage and runtime for a query
От | Faheem Mitha |
---|---|
Тема | Re: simultaneously reducing both memory usage and runtime for a query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.00.1004011150210.26028@orwell.homelinux.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: simultaneously reducing both memory usage and runtime for a query (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: simultaneously reducing both memory usage and
runtime for a query
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Faheem Mitha wrote: >> I submitted a modified self-contained email as requested, but it does not >> appear to have made it to the list, and I never got any kind of reject >> message. It was around 1000 lines with no attachments. Is there a size >> limit for posts, and if so, what is it? If it was rejected due to some >> filter, it would be desirable (and polite) if the recepient was told what >> happened. > > The bottom line is that this email list is best at answering short, > detailed questions. Larger questions that require a lot of analysis by > readers are often ignored. The question is not really that complex and I (perhaps mistakenly) thought it would be of interest to the PostgreSQL community. Maybe I'll try resubmitting a part of the question. Regardless, you don't address why the email I sent disappeared into the ether. If it was rejected due to excessive length, then it would be polite to get an automated rejection. Perhaps something like "Your message is too long and so is being rejected. Messages to the ... mailing list need to be under x lines" Regards, Faheem.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: