Re: SSD + RAID
От | Matthew Wakeling |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SSD + RAID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.00.0912081421120.25000@aragorn.flymine.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SSD + RAID (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SSD + RAID
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Greg Smith wrote: > In order for a drive to work reliably for database use such as for > PostgreSQL, it cannot have a volatile write cache. You either need a write > cache with a battery backup (and a UPS doesn't count), or to turn the cache > off. The SSD performance figures you've been looking at are with the drive's > write cache turned on, which means they're completely fictitious and > exaggerated upwards for your purposes. In the real world, that will result > in database corruption after a crash one day. Seagate are claiming to be on the ball with this one. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/08/seagate_pulsar_ssd/ Matthew -- The third years are wandering about all worried at the moment because they have to hand in their final projects. Please be sympathetic to them, say things like "ha-ha-ha", but in a sympathetic tone of voice -- Computer Science Lecturer
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: