Re: Most effective insert or replace
От | Matthew Wakeling |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Most effective insert or replace |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.00.0907031209540.16183@aragorn.flymine.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Most effective insert or replace (Sergei Politov <spolitov@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Sergei Politov wrote: > As far as I recall postgres does not have built-in support for "insert or replace" feature. > Please comment these ways and propose effective ways to simulate "insert or replace" behavior. > Also in may case I'm making a lot of inserts in a batch. A few years ago I researched this, and came up with the following method as seeming the fastest: BEGIN; DELETE FROM table WHERE id IN (big long list); COPY table FROM STDIN BINARY; COMMIT; However, our circumstances may not be the same as yours for the following reasons: 1. We are updating whole rows indexed by primary key, not just a single field in each row. 2. We are able to use the COPY command - indeed we wrote a fair amount of Java to enable batching, background writing, and COPY support. See http://www.flymine.org/api/index.html?org/intermine/sql/writebatch/Batch.html and http://www.intermine.org/ 3. HOT has been invented since then, and it won't play well with this method. Matthew -- Trying to write a program that can't be written is... well, it can be an enormous amount of fun! -- Computer Science Lecturer
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: