Re: raid10 hard disk choice
От | Matthew Wakeling |
---|---|
Тема | Re: raid10 hard disk choice |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.00.0905211356440.4125@aragorn.flymine.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | raid10 hard disk choice (Linos <info@linos.es>) |
Ответы |
Re: raid10 hard disk choice
Re: raid10 hard disk choice Re: raid10 hard disk choice |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Linos wrote: > i have to buy a new server and in the budget i have (small) i have to > select one of this two options: > > -4 sas 146gb 15k rpm raid10. > -8 sas 146gb 10k rpm raid10. It depends what you are doing. I think in most situations, the second option is better, but there may be a few situations where the reverse is true. Basically, the first option will only be faster if you are doing lots of seeking (small requests) in a single thread. As soon as you go multi-threaded or are looking at sequential scans, you're better off with more discs. Matthew -- Experience is what allows you to recognise a mistake the second time you make it.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: