Re: Raid 10 chunksize
От | Matthew Wakeling |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Raid 10 chunksize |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.00.0904011746360.21772@aragorn.flymine.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Raid 10 chunksize (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Stef Telford <stef@ummon.com> wrote: >> I do agree that the benefit is probably from write-caching, but I >> think that this is a 'win' as long as you have a UPS or BBU adaptor, >> and really, in a prod environment, not having a UPS is .. well. Crazy ? > > You do know that UPSes can fail, right? En masse sometimes even. I just lost all my diary appointments and address book data on my Palm device, because of a similar attitude. The device stores all its data in RAM, and never syncs it to permanent storage (like the SD card in the expansion slot). But that's fine, right, because it has a battery, therefore it can never fail? Well, it has the failure mode that if it ever crashes hard, or the battery fails momentarily due to jogging around in a pocket, then it just wipes all its data and starts from scratch. Computers crash. Hardware fails. Relying on un-backed-up RAM to keep your data safe does not work. Matthew -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." -- Rich Cook
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: