Re: [PERFORMANCE] Buying hardware
От | david@lang.hm |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PERFORMANCE] Buying hardware |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.DEB.1.10.0901262001390.16162@asgard.lang.hm обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PERFORMANCE] Buying hardware (David Rees <drees76@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PERFORMANCE] Buying hardware
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, David Rees wrote: > And yes, the more memory you can squeeze into the machine, the better, > though you'll find that after a certain point, price starts going up > steeply. Of course, if you only have a 15GB database, once you reach > 16GB of memory you've pretty much hit the point of diminishing > returns. actually, you need more memory than that. besides the data itself you would want memory for several other things, among them: 1. your OS 2. your indexes 3. you per-request memory allocations (for sorting, etc) this is highly dependant on your workload (type and number of parallel requests) 4. 'dead' tuples in your table (that will be cleared by a vaccum, but haven't been yet) and probably other things as well. I don't know how large a database will fit in 16G of ram, but I suspect it's closer to 8G than 15G. any experts want to throw out a rule-of-thumb here? David Lang
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: