Re: [PERFORMANCE] Buying hardware
От | Matthew Wakeling |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PERFORMANCE] Buying hardware |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.DEB.1.10.0901261203450.4317@aragorn.flymine.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PERFORMANCE] Buying hardware (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PERFORMANCE] Buying hardware
Re: [PERFORMANCE] Buying hardware |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Scott Marlowe wrote: > More cores is more important than faster but fewer > > Again, more slower disks > fewer slower ones. Not necessarily. It depends what you are doing. If you're going to be running only one database connection at a time, doing really big complex queries, then having really fast CPUs and discs is better than having lots. However, that situation is rare. > RAID-10 is almost always the right choice. Agreed. Unless you don't care about the data and need the space, where RAID 0 might be useful, or if you really don't need the space, where RAID 1 might be okay. If your controller supports it. Matthew -- The third years are wandering about all worried at the moment because they have to hand in their final projects. Please be sympathetic to them, say things like "ha-ha-ha", but in a sympathetic tone of voice -- Computer Science Lecturer
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: