Re: Software vs. Hardware RAID Data
| От | david@lang.hm |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Software vs. Hardware RAID Data |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | alpine.DEB.1.10.0808192244380.12859@asgard.lang.hm обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Software vs. Hardware RAID Data ("Mark Wong" <markwkm@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Software vs. Hardware RAID Data
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Mark Wong wrote: > Hi all, > > We started an attempt to slice the data we've been collecting in > another way, to show the results of software vs. hardware RAID: > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/HP_ProLiant_DL380_G5_Tuning_Guide#Hardware_vs._Software_Raid > > The angle we're trying to show here is the processor utilization and > i/o throughput for a given file system and raid configuration. I > wasn't sure about the best way to present it, so this is how it looks > so far. Click on the results for a chart of the aggregate processor > utilization for the test. > > Comments, suggestions, criticisms, et al. welcome. it's really good to show cpu utilization as well as throughput, but how about showing the cpu utilization as %cpu per MB/s (possibly with a flag to indicate any entries that look like they may have hit cpu limits) why did you use 4M stripe size on the software raid? especially on raid 5 this seems like a lot of data to have to touch when making an update. David Lang
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: