Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
| От | Marc G. Fournier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | alpine.BSF.2.00.1011231248270.19981@hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly? |
| Список | pgsql-www |
Why would it? its cvs, not svn ... On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes: >> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Tom Lane wrote: >>> BTW, anoncvs.postgresql.org still doesn't resolve for me. Shouldn't >>> that DNS update have propagated by now? > >> Fixed ... > > OK, now it resolves, but it doesn't respond on port 80. > > regards, tom lane > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scrappy@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy@hub.org
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: