Re: List traffic
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: List traffic |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.BSF.2.00.1005111054340.85296@hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: List traffic (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: List traffic
Re: List traffic |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: >> >> Traffic on the PostgreSQL lists is very high now and I freely admit that >> reading every email is simply not possible for me, even the ones that >> mention topics that keyword searches tell me are of potential interest. >> >> If anybody knows of a bug or suspected bug in my code, I have no problem >> in being copied in on mails so that I can see the issues exist. I do not >> promise to respond to every mail I'm copied on, though, but it at least >> helps me manage the fire hydrant. > > [ email only to hackers; admin and general email lists removed ] > > I completely understand the problem of keeping up with the email lists. > Because you are a committer, I hope you will be able to monitor > post-commit feedback for patches you apply. Other than that, I can > collect bug reports related to your work and ask you to review a web > page occasionally. However, it is hard to do this during beta because > the bugs usually need to be addressed quickly. If list traffic, especially on -hackers, is getting so large, should we look at maybe splitting it? I could easily enough split things such that I duplicate the subscriber list, so nobody would have to subscribe, but it would make it easier for ppl to filter their incoming ... ? Not sure where the split would be, mind you ... almost thinking about patch review / discussions vs hashing out new features or something like that ... Just a thought ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scrappy@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy@hub.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: