Re: Impending freeze
От | Gordon Runkle |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Impending freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | akuv59$2fsp$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Impending freeze (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Impending freeze
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 02 Sep 2002 01:20:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > My two cents: once we ship beta1 we should try really really hard to > avoid forcing an initdb cycle before final release. We can make all the > portability fixes and code fixes we like, but we have to avoid > disk-file-contents changes and system catalog changes. If we force an > initdb then we're penalizing beta testers who might have been foolish > enough to load large databases into the beta version --- and yeah, there > were no guarantees, but will they do it again next beta cycle? Well, speaking as a user and tester, I don't mind an initdb between beta releases -- and I'm planning on loading ~8GB of data. I've been playing with the CVS tip all week using a ~2GB dataset, and having to initdb every other day or so. No biggie, and I'm getting to test pg_dump, as a bonus! ;-) I suppose some delicate souls would be put off by an initdb, or get sore at experiencing the reason Beta != Production, but I think the serious users will prefer that you developers have a free hand to do whatever is necessary to make 7.3 as good as it can be. My US$0.02, Gordon. -- "Far and away the best prize that life has to offer is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." -- Theodore Roosevelt
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: