Re: Connection Pooling directly on Postgres Server
От | Gavin M. Roy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Connection Pooling directly on Postgres Server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | af1bce590709070908g13727ef8j9cf22a56ef139915@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Connection Pooling directly on Postgres Server (Denis Gasparin <denis@edistar.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
You'll want to evaluate pgBouncer to see if it meets your needs. It works very well for general proxying, connection pooling. On 9/7/07, Denis Gasparin <denis@edistar.com> wrote: > I'm looking for connection pooling solutions for our php/apache server. > > I already checked pgpool and pgbouncer but during the tests, I had the > following (mad) idea... > > Why not to implement a connection pooling server side as apache for > example does? > > I try to explain my idea... > > The postgres server maintains a number of connections always alive (as > apache for example does) > even if a client disconnects. > > The following parameters could be used to tune the number of connections > kept alive server side: > > StartServers: number of postgres already active connections at server start > MinSpareServers: If there are fewer than MinSpareServers, it creates a > new spare (connection) > MaxSpareServers: If there are more than MaxSpareServers, some of the > spares (connections) die off. > > The parameters has been taken directly from an apache httpd.conf sample... > > Could it be possible to implement a similar solution on postgres? > > What to do you think about this? > > Thank you, > Denis > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: