Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007)
От | Gavin M. Roy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | af1bce590708301219t2e39be9dh69f0eae427e9104@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007) (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007)
(Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007) ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
With the only caveat that the Anniversary Summit was official? On 8/30/07, Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On Thursday 30 August 2007 14:22, Dave Page wrote: > > > ------- Original Message ------- > > > From: "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie@gmail.com> > > > To: "Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org>, "Joshua D. Drake" > > > <jd@commandprompt.com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus@hagander.net>, > > > "PostgreSQL Advocacy List" <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org> Sent: > > > 30/08/07, 19:02:35 > > > Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference > > > Fal l 2007) > > > > > > On 8/30/07, Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> wrote: > > > > I am. What I object to is declaring this as a postgresql.org conference > > > > when it hasn't been generally agreed in an appropriate community forum > > > > (which would be -advocacy imho). Doing so effectively allows *anyone* > > > > to organise an event and call it 'official' - which I believe is > > > > definitely not something we want for a whole heap of reasons. > > > > > > I would like for this to be an 'official' event. > > > > > > How do we go about getting 'official' approval? > > > > There is no formal process (yet), but I would suggest that general > > agreement (or lack of disagreement) of this forum (-advocacy) that the > > organisers are well enough known to be trusted and the proposed event is > > appropriate. > > > > Personally I have no doubts on either point in this instance, given that > > you and JD are involved. Anyone disagree? > > > > Slightly.... Dan was well known in the community and had a well known list of > community members on his organizing committee, yet that was not seen as an > official conference as far as pgdg was concerned, so I'd guess the "official" > answer to her questions would be: > > The postgresql project does not run/endorse/promote any specific conference as > an official postgresql conference, despite any claims from promoters to the > contrary. Similar to training and certification, there are many 3rd parties > that offer these services; we recommend you evaluate them on thier own > merits. > > -- > Robert Treat > Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:
Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Upcoming PostgreSQL conferences (next 12 months)