Re: wal stats questions
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: wal stats questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aef10441-c27a-80ce-20fb-4d9d60f2be52@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: wal stats questions (Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: wal stats questions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/05/11 18:46, Masahiro Ikeda wrote: > > > On 2021/05/11 16:44, Fujii Masao wrote: >> >> >> On 2021/04/28 9:10, Masahiro Ikeda wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2021/04/27 21:56, Fujii Masao wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2021/04/26 10:11, Masahiro Ikeda wrote: >>>>> >>>>> First patch has only the changes for pg_stat_wal view. >>>>> ("v6-0001-performance-improvements-of-reporting-wal-stats-without-introducing-a-new-variable.patch") >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> + pgWalUsage.wal_records == prevWalUsage.wal_records && >>>> + walStats.wal_write == 0 && walStats.wal_sync == 0 && >>>>> WalStats.m_wal_write should be checked here instead of walStats.wal_write? >>> >>> Thanks! Yes, I'll fix it. >> >> Thanks! > > Thanks for your comments! > I fixed them. Thanks for updating the patch! if ((pgStatTabList == NULL || pgStatTabList->tsa_used == 0) && pgStatXactCommit == 0 && pgStatXactRollback == 0 && + pgWalUsage.wal_records == prevWalUsage.wal_records && + WalStats.m_wal_write == 0 && WalStats.m_wal_sync == 0 && I'm just wondering if the above WAL activity counters need to be checked. Maybe it's not necessary because "pgStatXactCommit == 0 && pgStatXactRollback == 0" is checked? IOW, is there really the case where WAL activity counters are updated even when both pgStatXactCommit and pgStatXactRollback are zero? + if (pgWalUsage.wal_records != prevWalUsage.wal_records) + { + WalUsage walusage; + + /* + * Calculate how much WAL usage counters were increased by substracting + * the previous counters from the current ones. Fill the results in + * WAL stats message. + */ + MemSet(&walusage, 0, sizeof(WalUsage)); + WalUsageAccumDiff(&walusage, &pgWalUsage, &prevWalUsage); Isn't it better to move the code "prevWalUsage = pgWalUsage" into here? Because it's necessary only when pgWalUsage.wal_records != prevWalUsage.wal_records. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: