Re: Adding support for SSLKEYLOGFILE in the frontend
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding support for SSLKEYLOGFILE in the frontend |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aec5bdde-922d-4da5-aaf6-c35a378aa59d@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adding support for SSLKEYLOGFILE in the frontend (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01.07.25 10:47, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> On 29 Jun 2025, at 12:56, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: >> >> On 27.06.25 11:15, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>>> On 26 Jun 2025, at 23:06, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: >>>> I'll propose changes for these comments in the morning when coffee has been >>>> had. >>> The attached moves to logging on stderr along with a test for this, and also >>> removes the WARNING prefix that was added to the other stderr loggings since >>> that seems out of place compared to other stderr loggings in libpq (the >>> sslpassword trunction WARNING is clearly warranted, these were not). >> >> Hmm, I thought the WARNING prefixes were good. I think these are similar to >> >> "WARNING: password file \"%s\" is not a plain file\n" >> >> in that something during the connection setup is being ignored. >> >> Otherwise, if you just write something but don't tag it with something like warning or error, it's not clear how the useris supposed to interpret it. Is it a progress message, is it something bad, etc.? > > Fair. As this is a connection debugging tool and not for regular use I wasn't > thinking of them as warnings per se (I was more classifying them as the "out of > memory" errors which are printed without a prefix), but I also don't mind > adding them back. Done in v2 with other comments addressed as well. This patch version looks good to me.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: