Re: NOT NULL CHECK (mycol !='') :good idea? bad idea?
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: NOT NULL CHECK (mycol !='') :good idea? bad idea? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aeb5d614-c77e-073c-e25a-4eb1dbfc3b7a@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: NOT NULL CHECK (mycol !='') :good idea? bad idea? (David W Noon <david.w.noon@googlemail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: NOT NULL CHECK (mycol !='') :good idea? bad idea?
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On 06/03/2016 11:56 AM, David W Noon wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:16:33 -0700, Michael Moore > (michaeljmoore@gmail.com) wrote about "[SQL] NOT NULL CHECK (mycol > !='') :good idea? bad idea?" (in > <CACpWLjPX-_80aXcJFbk7wxZWKPTs2Fyeywe=6HmgorzV2U=n7A@mail.gmail.com>): > >> In Oracle, a NOT NULL constraint on a table column of VARCHAR in >> essence says: "You need to put at least 1 character for a value". >> There is no such thing as a zero-length string in Oracle, it's >> either NULL or it has some characters. > > So Oracle is not compliant with ANSI standard SQL. Though it looks like they want to be: http://docs.oracle.com/database/121/SQLRF/sql_elements005.htm#SQLRF30037 "Note: Oracle Database currently treats a character value with a length of zero as null. However, this may not continue to be true in future releases, and Oracle recommends that you do not treat empty strings the same as nulls." -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: