Re: Replication Recommendation
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication Recommendation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aea5f204-e6a0-25b2-c5d1-63b2ee69cbcb@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Replication Recommendation (Lee Hachadoorian <Lee.Hachadoorian+L@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replication Recommendation
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 09/12/2016 12:46 PM, Lee Hachadoorian wrote: > There are a wide variety of Postgres replication solutions, and I > would like advice on which one would be appropriate to my use case. > > * Small (~half dozen) distributed workforce using a file sharing > service, but without access to direct network connection over the > internet > * Database is updated infrequently, when new government agency data > releases replace old data > * Because database is updated infrequently, workforce can come > together for LAN-based replication as needed > * Entire database is on the order of a few GB > > Given this, I am considering the super lowtech "replication" solution > of updating "master" and doing a full database drop and restore on the > "slaves". But I would like to know which of the other (real) > replication solutions might work for this use case. If I follow correctly the layout is?: Main database <--- Govt. data | | \ / File share | | \ / DB DB DB DB DB DB User 1 User 2 User 3 User 4 User 5 User 6 For your simple scenario you might want to look at: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/app-pgbasebackup.html > > Regards, > --Lee > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: