RE: BUG #19069: pg_advisory_xact_lock() in a WITH query doesn't work

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Maciej Walczak
Тема RE: BUG #19069: pg_advisory_xact_lock() in a WITH query doesn't work
Дата
Msg-id ae57b96787364f5892fb86e85e9e7118@megavision.pl
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на BUG #19069: pg_advisory_xact_lock() in a WITH query doesn't work  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Thank you.
I missed those parts of the documentation. I should have studied it more carefully.

The reason I tried to use WITH is that a separate

SELECT pg_advisory_xact_lock(1);

statement confuses my object mapper (Dapper) when I want to use a RETURNING clause in the INSERT.
I found a workaround:

DO $$ BEGIN
    PERFORM pg_advisory_xact_lock(1);
END $$;

Regards
Maciej Walczak

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Sent: 02 October 2025 22:14
To: Maciej Walczak <m.walczak@megavision.pl>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #19069: pg_advisory_xact_lock() in a WITH query doesn't work

PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> This doesn't actually do any locking:

> BEGIN;
> WITH my_lock AS (
>         SELECT pg_advisory_xact_lock(1)
> )
> INSERT INTO my_table (...) VALUES (...); COMMIT;

That looks as-expected to me.  The docs say [1]

    [ This works because ] PostgreSQL's implementation evaluates only
    as many rows of a WITH query as are actually fetched by the parent
    query.

which is to say, none at all in this case.  There's also this in [2]:

    Data-modifying statements in WITH are executed exactly once, and
    always to completion, independently of whether the primary query
    reads all (or indeed any) of their output. Notice that this is
    different from the rule for SELECT in WITH: as stated in the
    previous section, execution of a SELECT is carried only as far as
    the primary query demands its output.

You're apparently expecting the presence of a volatile function to cause the SELECT to be reclassified as
data-modifying,but we don't do it that way. 

I'd recommend being less cute and just writing

BEGIN;
SELECT pg_advisory_xact_lock(1);
INSERT INTO my_table (...) VALUES (...); COMMIT;

            regards, tom lane

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/queries-with.html#QUERIES-WITH-CYCLE

[2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/queries-with.html#QUERIES-WITH-MODIFYING



В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: