Re: Composite type: Primary Key and validation
От | Laurenz Albe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Composite type: Primary Key and validation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ae41cf7917a17d8399478035e98c65ba91b35e9f.camel@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Composite type: Primary Key and validation (Lorusso Domenico <domenico.l76@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Composite type: Primary Key and validation
Re: Composite type: Primary Key and validation |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2023-06-05 at 11:49 +0200, Lorusso Domenico wrote: > I've a couple of questions about composite type. > Suppose this composite type: > CREATE TYPE my_type AS ( > user_ts_start My_start_timestamp, > user_ts_end My_end_timestamp, > db_ts_start My_start_timestamp, > db_ts_end My_end_timestamp, > audit_record jsonb > ); > My_start_timestamp is a domain of timestamp with default as now(). > My_end_timestamp is a domain of timestamp with default as infinite > > 1. May I use user_ts_start and/or db_ts_start has part of Primary Key of a table that contains a field of my_type? > 2. to add an overall check constraint on the entire composite type, could be a valid > approach to create a domain based on my_type and add a custom function to validate it? (check_my_type(VALUE)). > In this way I've a dominan of composite type that contain others domain... what do you think? Avoid using composite types as data types for a table column. It adds complexity for no clear gain. Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: