Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB?
От | Sid Murthy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ae17b9cc0604090651y160ed397p6bec93ce62f99a63@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB? (Mike <1100100@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB?
Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB? |
Список | pgsql-novice |
MySQL 5 is quickly catching up. Maybe someone can elaborate on the advantages of Postgres over MySQL 5?
thanks,
-Sid
--
Sid Murthy
thanks,
-Sid
On 4/9/06, Mike <1100100@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Momjian,
Congratulations on the new position at EnterpriseDB.On 4/8/06, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us > wrote:ebcorder@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> I started using PostgreSQL\Postgis in January. Lately I have been
> reading on the internet many rumblings about PostgreSQL being slower than
> MySQL/SQLLite etc etc. Comparisons made were routine inserts , updates,
> and deletes. Is any of this true? If so,are there methods to speed
> things up? I used the Explain Analyze command on portgesSQL it seemed
> fast although I have not run any other DB's.
> I know when comparison tests are performed they can be tilted on these
> internet sites. But I see so many people declaring PostgreSQL to be the
> slowest I am thinking where there is smoke there's fire.
Lots of people still think Elvis is alive. :-)
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Sid Murthy
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: