Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom?
От | torikoshia |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | add1e591fbe8874107e75d04328859ec@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom? (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-03-26 17:46, Fujii Masao wrote: > On 2021/03/26 0:33, torikoshia wrote: >> On 2021-03-25 22:14, Fujii Masao wrote: >>> On 2021/03/23 16:32, torikoshia wrote: >>>> On 2021-03-05 17:47, Fujii Masao wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks for your comments! >>> >>> Thanks for updating the patch! >>> >>> PostgreSQL Patch Tester reported that the patched version failed to >>> be compiled >>> at Windows. Could you fix this issue? >>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.131238 >>> >> >> It seems PGDLLIMPORT was necessary.. >> Attached a new one. > > Thanks for updating the patch! > > In my test, generic_calls for a utility command was not incremented > before PL/pgSQL function was executed. Maybe this is expected behavior. > But it was incremented after the function was executed. Is this a bug? > Please see the following example. Thanks for reviewing! It's a bug and regrettably it seems difficult to fix it during this commitfest. Marked the patch as "Withdrawn". Regards,
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: