Re: Does Type Have = Operator?
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Does Type Have = Operator? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ad91feb3-62a4-dbcd-6bcf-9c5609388276@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Does Type Have = Operator? ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Does Type Have = Operator?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/12/16 4:25 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On May 12, 2016, at 12:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Andrew mentions in the extension you pointed to that providing a default >> comparison operator would enable people to do UNION, DISTINCT, etc on JSON >> columns without thinking about it. I'm not convinced that "without >> thinking about it" is a good thing here. But if we were going to enable >> that, I'd feel better about making it default to jsonb semantics ... > > If you want the JSONB semantics, why wouldn’t you use JSONB instead of JSON? Probably in an attempt to bypass parse overhead on ingestion. Possibly because JSONB silently eats duplicated keys while JSON doesn't (though in that case even casting to JSONB is probably not what you want). -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: