Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
От | Konstantin Knizhnik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | abaef102-e7a2-f86a-6df9-c6d92b65d989@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 23.03.2018 18:45, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Konstantin Knizhnik wrote: > >> rd_projidx is not a list, it is Bitmapset. It is just one of many bitmap >> sets in RelationData: > Yes, but the other bitmapsets are of AttrNumber of the involved column. > They new one is of list_nth() counters for items in the index list. > That seems weird and it scares me -- do we use that coding pattern > elsewhere? Maybe use an array of OIDs instead? > Using list or array instead of bitmap requires much more space... And bitmaps are much more efficient for many operations: check for element presence, combine, intersect,... Check in bitmap has O(0) complexity so iterating through list of all indexes or attributes with bitmap check doesn't add any essential overhead. Sorry, I do not understand this: "They new one is of list_nth() counters for items in the index list" -- Konstantin Knizhnik Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: