Re: SSL/TLS instead of SSL in docs

On 30.06.21 22:46, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I think consistency is the interesting aspect here.  We already have a mix of
> SSL, TLS and SSL/TLS (although heavily skewed towards SSL) so we should settle
> on one and stick to it.  The arguments in the NSS thread which led to this
> pointed to SSL/TLS.  If we feel that the churn isn't worth it, then we should
> change all to SSL and perhaps instead just add TLS as indexterms to those
> sections.

I think it is already consistent in that it uses "SSL".  Is that not the 
case?

I notice that the NSS documentation also uses "SSL" almost exclusively 
when referring to the SSL and TLS protocols and related APIs.