Re: Refining query statement
От | Thomas Kellerer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Refining query statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aa3d9ff5-608e-02d6-5a3e-4585e4491630@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Refining query statement (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver schrieb am 15.01.2019 um 17:44: >>> So we end up with something like this: >>> >>> select distinct on (C.contact_id) C.contact_id, C.lname, C.fname, C.direct_phone, O.org_name, A.next_contact >>> from Contacts as C >>> join Organizations as O on C.org_id = O.org_id >>> join Activities as A on C.contact_id = A.contact_id >>> where A.next_contact <= 'today' >>> and A.next_contact > '2018-12-31' >>> order by c.contact_id, a.next_contact DESC; >> >> And I've never liked this method (though I'm old and crotchety).... >> > > What is the specific objection? > > To me: > > 1) Plus side. It saves an explicit sub-query > > 2) Minus side. It is not portable. But then complete portability is a unicorn in my opinion. I think Ron was referring to the JOIN operator, rather than the DISTINCT ON
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: