Re: Re: [proposal] Add an option for returning SQLSTATE in psql errormessage
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [proposal] Add an option for returning SQLSTATE in psql errormessage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aa2e269f-aff4-97da-8a65-b4f6ffe2790a@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [proposal] Add an option for returning SQLSTATE in psql errormessage (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: [proposal] Add an option for returning SQLSTATE in psql error message
Re: [proposal] Add an option for returning SQLSTATE in psql errormessage |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/4/19 5:54 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:44:24PM +0100, didier wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 6:30 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>>> Why are you not including a test for \set VERBOSITY verbose? >>> >>> Stability of the output would be a problem ... >>> >>> Yes it could moreover the functionality wasn't tested before. >> Should I add one ? > > Unpredictible outputs mean more maintenance and more alternate > outputs. I have moved the patch to next CF, still ready for > committer. What do you think, Peter? Is the extra test valuable or will it cause unpredictable outputs as Tom and Michael predict? Regards, -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: