Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.
| От | Michael Paquier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | aSV_kS5_pL4DYw1J@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions. (Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 04:59:28PM +0800, Chao Li wrote: > I don’t see any of my comments are addressed in v18. Sorry about that, I thought that v17 was addressing these. I have reviewed your latest email posted here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2C8A20C7-4E08-41F4-B30E-AD9F8B007AE5@gmail.com And well, this presents a bunch of issues I have already fixed (break after return, one error message incorrect, some descriptions). The comments on top of the functions are actually true as they stand (aka ndistinct_array_end() fails if we don't have an array). There is no need to reset state vars upon a JSON_SEM_ACTION_FAILED AFAIK. Finally, the consts are non-appealing for me for functions that are internally used in these files. And forgot one: valid_subsequent_attnum()'s duplication is actually adapted IMO, the argument lists could have different assumptions depending on the type of extended stats we are dealing with. I did not check the comments for 0003~0005. Perhaps you are right that these need adjustments. Thanks, -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: