Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.
| От | Michael Paquier | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions. | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | aPcetUfI2NJDqYxZ@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions. (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.
            		
            		 Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.  | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 08:27:58PM -0400, Corey Huinker wrote: > And rebased again to conform to 688dc6299 and 4bd919129. The format redesign for extended stats is pretty nice, as done in 0001. I think that this patch should be split in two, actually, as it tackles two issues: - One patch for the format change. - Second patch for the introduction of the input function, useful on its own to allow more regression tests paths for the format generated. Similar split comment for 0002 regarding pg_dependencies. The format change is one thing. The input function is cool to have for input validation, still not absolutely mandatory for the core part of the format change. The functions exposed in 0003 should be renamed to match more with the style of the rest, aka it is a bit hard to figure out what they do at first sight. Presumably, these should be prefixed with some "statext_", except text_to_stavalues() which could still be named the same. Do you have some numbers regarding the increase in size this generates for the catalogs? 0004 has been designed following the same model as the relation and attribute stats. That sounds OK here. +enum extended_stats_argnum [...] +enum extended_stats_exprs_element It would be nice to document why such things are around. That would be less guessing for somebody reading the code. Reusing this small sequence from your pg_dump patch, executed on a v14 backend: create schema dump_test; CREATE TABLE dump_test.has_ext_stats AS SELECT g.g AS x, g.g / 2 AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) AS g(g); CREATE STATISTICS dump_test.es1 ON x, (y % 2) FROM dump_test.has_ext_stats; ANALYZE dump_test.has_ext_stats; Then pg_dump fails: pg_dump: error: query failed: ERROR: column e.inherited does not exist LINE 2: ...hemaname = $1 AND e.statistics_name = $2 ORDER BY e.inherite... + * TODO: Until v18 is released the master branch has a + * server_version_num of 180000. We will update this to 190000 as soon + * as the master branch updates. This part has not been updated. + Assert(item.nattributes > 0); /* TODO: elog? */ [...] + Assert(dependency->nattributes > 1); /* TODO: elog? */ Yes and yes. It seems like it should be possible to craft some input that triggers these.. +void +free_pg_dependencies(MVDependencies *dependencies); Double declaration of this routine in dependencies.c. Perhaps some of the regression tests could use some jsonb_pretty() in the outputs generated. Some of the results generated are very hard to parse, something that would become harder in the buildfarm. This comment starts with 0001 for stxdndistinct. I have mixed feelings about 0005, FWIW. I am wondering if we should not lift the needle a bit here and only support the dump of extended statistics when dealing with a backend of at least v19. This would mean that we would only get the full benefit of this feature once people upgrade to v20 or dump from a pg_dump with --statistics from at least v19, but with the long-term picture in mind this would also make the dump/restore picture of the patch dead simple (spoiler: I like simple). Tomas, what is your take about the format changes and my argument about the backward requirements of pg_dump (about not dumping these stats if connecting to a server older than v18, included)? -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: