Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
| От | Bruce Momjian | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | aOPZF83CkZqAxjae@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Mon, Oct  6, 2025 at 10:55:53AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Oct  3, 2025 at 10:41:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> > > If you look at this more closely, creating postgres-full.xml and running 
> > > the syntax check perform the same operations, except that the latter 
> > > throws away the output.  So it seems redundant to build a whole new code 
> > > path for this.  I think you can make the check target dependent on 
> > > postgres-full.xml and be done, kind of like this (starting from 
> > > pre-b2922562726):
> > 
> > Would it be unreasonable to discard the "check" target altogether?
> > It made sense back in the day when actually building the html docs
> > took many minutes.  But I haven't used it in years, so I wonder
> > if anyone else has either.
> 
> I run 'make check' on the SGML every time I build the C code.
Uh, more accurately I run:
    make --silent postgres.sgml
    make --silent check
    make check-tabs
-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com
  Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: