Re: [BUG]: the walsender does not update its IO statistics until it exits
От | Bertrand Drouvot |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUG]: the walsender does not update its IO statistics until it exits |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aNuDRhb/UrWQnPfv@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUG]: the walsender does not update its IO statistics until it exits (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUG]: the walsender does not update its IO statistics until it exits
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 12:09:46PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:08:17AM -0500, Andres Freund wrote: > > I think it's also bad that we don't have a solution for 1), even just for > > normal connections. If a backend causes a lot of IO we might want to know > > about that long before the longrunning transaction commits. > > > > I suspect the right design here would be to have a generalized form of the > > timeout mechanism we have for 2). > > > > For that we'd need to make sure that pgstat_report_stat() can be safely called > > inside a transaction. The second part would be to redesign the > > IdleStatsUpdateTimeoutPending mechanism so it is triggered independent of > > idleness, without introducing unacceptable overhead - I think that's doable. > > Agreed that something in the lines of non-transaction update of the > entries could be adapted in some cases, so +1 for the idea. I suspect > that there would be cases where a single stats kind should be able to > handle both transactional and non-transactional flush cases. > Splitting that across two stats kinds would lead to a lot of > duplication. One option could be to use 2 pending lists for the variables stats and 2 flush callbacks for fixed stats. Thoughts? Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: