Re: Batching in executor
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Batching in executor |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aNaZ6-DH5eVbFd9Y@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Batching in executor (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Batching in executor
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 10:28:33PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > At PGConf.dev this year we had an unconference session [1] on whether > the community can support an additional batch executor. The discussion > there led me to start hacking on $subject. I have also had off-list > discussions on this topic in recent months with Andres and David, who > have offered useful thoughts. > > This patch series is an early attempt to make executor nodes pass > around batches of tuples instead of tuple-at-a-time slots. The main > motivation is to enable expression evaluation in batch form, which can > substantially reduce per-tuple overhead (mainly from function calls) > and open the door to further optimizations such as SIMD usage in > aggregate transition functions. We could even change algorithms of > some plan nodes to operate on batches when, for example, a child node > can return batches. For background, people might want to watch these two videos from POSETTE 2025. The first video explains how data warehouse query needs are different from OLTP needs: Building a PostgreSQL data warehouse https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpq4nfEoioE and the second one explains the executor optimizations done in PG 18: Hacking Postgres Executor For Performance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3Ye9UlcR5Y I learned from these two videos that to handle new workloads, I need to think of the query demands differently, and of course can this be accomplished without hampering OLTP workloads? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: