Re: "openssl" should not be optional
От | Christoph Berg |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "openssl" should not be optional |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aNQKqD8bHmy05Z3p@msg.df7cb.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "openssl" should not be optional (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: "openssl" should not be optional
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Daniel Gustafsson > Looking at this I was reminded that we already handle this by using a fallback > and the test worked all along. The message for this was quite poorly worded > though, and used a warning instead of a note. The attached will try to detect > openssl being missing before trying to run it, and will skip the warning > message if the fallback is used (which really isn't a warning in the first > place). Thanks, I just built the postgresql-18 again with this patch (and openssl not installed [*]). It passes fine now. In the meantime, I also got the report that postgresql-17 is not failing in that environment, so the problem is new in 18. > The ERROR in 003_sslinfo is intentional, we are testing that processing fails > by passing an invalid value. Ah, I was mentioning that in the original report because it only showed up in the failing log, but that's just because the non-failing build does not go scraping the test log files. That made the problem look bigger than it actually was. Thanks, Christoph [*] future builds will have openssl as build-dependency.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: