On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 11:38:22AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> That said, I did go overboard here and converted all the struct/union
> combinations I could find, but I'm not necessarily proposing to apply
> all of them. I'm proposing patches 0001 through 0004, which are
> relatively simple or in areas that have already changed a few times
> recently (so backpatching would not be trivial anyway), and/or they
> are somewhat close to my heart because they originally motivated this
> work a long time ago. But if someone finds among the other patches
> one that they particularly like, we could add that one as well.
I would have used this in the DSM registry if it was available. Patch
attached.
--
nathan