On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 10:52:31AM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
> > One argument for keeping the tests would be that they nicely bring together the side-effect (logging) and these
use-cases,whereas in the code they're pretty distant, making the connection not obvious.
>
> Another argument is that we have no coverage on temp logging, which
> is why this bug was discovered. There are likely plenty of tools
> out there, for example pgbadger or manual log analysis, that
> have probably misinterpreted temporary usage all this time,
> because of the way the data was emitted.
Perhaps this is a sign that there is no need to be really aggressive
with backpatching aanything, as well. At least that's my impression.
--
Michael