On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 07:04:36PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
> "NB: We assume that this struct contains no padding. Also, 8 bytes
> allocated for the object ID are good enough to ensure the uniqueness
> of the hash key, hence the addition of new fields is not recommended."
Works for me.
> Also, what about we also add the assert as done earlier in this thread [0]
> to ensure that the struct indeed does not have padding?
I still want to add it, but it also seemed like you were not much a
fan of it, so I did not really want to push forward with something
that was not loved. :D
Addressing your points, attached is an updated patch labelled v2.
--
Michael