Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | aMioU500pBYs_mBz@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Latest patches break one of our unit-test, related to RLS (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 05:00:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> writes: > > I came up with the attached patch set. > > I did some more work on the comments, adjusted a couple of places that > could be simplified, and pushed it. My apologies for the silence here. The timing of the events is interesting. I have been pinged about this issue on Friday evening/night time here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202509121631.dtn5kw5er2m5@alvherre.pgsql For a fix applied as of cdf7feb96562 roughly 24 hours after this ping. The timing was a bit bad for me, because I was already gone for what was a long weekend in Japan, just back today. So it was a bit hard for me to look at anything > I didn't really love the "fix it and then explain it afterward" > approach. It's hard to review a patch if you don't understand the > logic. I considered swapping the order of the two patches, but > eventually just merged them into one. Merging both things makes sense as well here. Ugh, yes. That was wrong. With the fix, '%' is translated: - Filter: (f1 ~ '^(?:[\a].*)$'::text) Before the fix, not translated. + Filter: (f1 ~ '^(?:[\a]%)$'::text) Thanks for the report, the analysis, and the commit. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: