Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
От | Rajesh Kumar Mallah |
---|---|
Тема | Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a97c77030705301258u1ef4e895h8fd32bfcadf22248@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives (mark@mark.mielke.cc) |
Ответы |
Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Sorry for posting and disappearing. i am still not clear what is the best way of throwing in more disks into the system. does more stripes means more performance (mostly) ? also is there any thumb rule about best stripe size ? (8k,16k,32k...) regds mallah On 5/30/07, mark@mark.mielke.cc <mark@mark.mielke.cc> wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:51:45AM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote: > > > This is standard stuff, very well proven: try googling 'self healing zfs'. > > The first hit on this search is a demo of ZFS detecting corruption of one of > > the mirror pair using checksums, very cool: > > > > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/demos/selfheal/;jsessionid=52508 > > D464883F194061E341F58F4E7E1 > > > > The bad drive is pointed out directly using the checksum and the data > > integrity is preserved. > > One part is corruption. Another is ordering and consistency. ZFS represents > both RAID-style storage *and* journal-style file system. I imagine consistency > and ordering is handled through journalling. > > Cheers, > mark > > -- > mark@mielke.cc / markm@ncf.ca / markm@nortel.com __________________________ > . . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder > |\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ | > | | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada > > One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all > and in the darkness bind them... > > http://mark.mielke.cc/ > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: