Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
От | greg@turnstep.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a90b1033991b464ffd0f4997a5193f24@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > However, I can only reasonably manage Techdocs if it's on a production-ready > Content Management System, with simplified page editing, multi-user rights > management, and revision history. Call me a traditionalist, but how about the traditional cvs + "your favorite editor" approach? I don't think the techdocs section changes so often that we need fancy wiki / edit-from-the-web-on-the-fly sort of technology here. I also agree with Marc that there is no need to move it elsewhere right now. Let's just keep it simple, focus on the content, and add other things later. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200304140946 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html iD8DBQE+mrwvvJuQZxSWSsgRAvMtAJ9CrkU1WgOf5SafG8l4aJYJpsWOfACgsCHI C+DCSdHAkMnhFmIu9ctw2dA= =ZhMl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: